Donald Trump has asked the US Supreme Court to rescue his tariff measures. He wants the justices to overturn a ruling that declared his sweeping duties unlawful.
Dispute over presidential authority
The administration filed its petition on Wednesday night. It asks the court to decide quickly whether a president can impose tariffs without Congress. Last week, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 7-4 against Trump. Judges stressed that the authority to set import duties belongs only to Congress.
High financial stakes
The case could unravel Trump’s trade and foreign policy plans. It may also force Washington to repay billions in collected tariffs. Trump defended his actions under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The law allows presidential steps against “unusual and extraordinary” threats. In April, he declared an economic emergency, claiming trade imbalances harmed US industry and threatened security.
Enforcement delayed for appeal
Although the appeals court ruled against Trump, it delayed enforcement to allow time for appeal. “The stakes in this case could not be higher,” Solicitor General John Sauer wrote in Wednesday’s filing. He argued the decision disrupted key trade talks and spread legal uncertainty. He warned it weakened the president’s ability to prevent an economic and foreign policy crisis.
Small firms driving lawsuits
The lawsuits were filed by small businesses that say the tariffs put their survival at risk. Their lawyers voiced confidence in victory. “These unlawful duties are damaging small businesses,” said Jeffrey Schwab of the Liberty Justice Center. “We hope for a swift resolution for our clients.” If the Supreme Court rejects the case, the ruling takes effect on October 14.
Earlier courtroom setbacks
In May, the Court of International Trade in New York also struck down the tariffs. That decision was suspended during the appeals process. The cases were brought by small firms and a coalition of US states. In April, Trump signed executive orders introducing a 10 percent baseline tariff and “reciprocal” tariffs on more than 90 countries.
Global consequences
The appeals court also invalidated tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China. Trump argued they were vital to stop drug imports. Other duties, such as those on steel and aluminum, remain in force. They were introduced under separate presidential authority.
